Jump to content
Калькуляторы

Cisco 7505 VS 7507, 7505 выигрывает. Не могу понять, почему загрузка проца на 7507 больше, а трафика меньше

День добрый всем, имеею две циски

7505

 

ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 11.1(8)CA1, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
BOOTLDR: RSP Software (RSP-BOOT-M), Version 12.0(9)S, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)

Cisco RSP4 (R5000) processor with 131072K/2072K bytes of memory.
R5000 CPU at 200MHz, Implementation 35, Rev 2.1, 512KB L2 Cache
Last reset from power-on
Chassis Interface.
1 AIP controller (1 ATM).
1 VIP2 R5K controller (2 FastEthernet).
2 FastEthernet interfaces
1 ATM interface
123K bytes of NVRAM.

250880K bytes of ATA PCMCIA card at slot 0 (Sector size 512 bytes).
8192K bytes of Flash internal SIMM (Sector size 256K).
Configuration register is 0x2102

 

B 7507

 

ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 11.1(8)CA1, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
BOOTLDR: RSP Software (RSP-BOOT-M), Version 12.0(9)S, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Cisco RSP4 (R5000) processor with 262144K/2072K bytes of memory.
R5000 CPU at 200MHz, Implementation 35, Rev 2.1, 512KB L2 Cache
Last reset from power-on
Chassis Interface.
1 VIP2 R5K controller (2 FastEthernet).
2 FastEthernet interfaces
123K bytes of NVRAM.
125440K bytes of ATA PCMCIA card at slot 0 (Sector size 512 bytes).
8192K bytes of Flash internal SIMM (Sector size 256K).
No slave installed in slot 3.
Configuration register is 0x2102

 

На обоих цисках есть BGP, OSPF, GRE, обе в инет смотрят, конфиги как бы довольно сильно похожи, но 7505 в РАЗЫ лучше трафик ест

Вот пример 7505

 

#show interfaces fastEthernet 3/0/0
FastEthernet3/0/0 is up, line protocol is up

 5 minute input rate 11561000 bits/sec, 9338 packets/sec
 5 minute output rate 8630000 bits/sec, 9867 packets/sec

Router-77pbx-kar#show interfaces fastEthernet 3/1/0
FastEthernet3/1/0 is up, line protocol is up
 5 minute input rate 3485000 bits/sec, 2492 packets/sec
 5 minute output rate 6463000 bits/sec, 1957 packets/sec

CPU utilization for five seconds: 44%/41%; one minute: 41%; five minutes: 41%
PID Runtime(ms)   Invoked      uSecs   5Sec   1Min   5Min TTY Process
 74    13242800  32033648        413  1.14%  0.56%  0.53%   0 IP Input

 

А 7507 в разы хуже

 

 

show interfaces fastEthernet 4/0/0
FastEthernet4/0/0 is up, line protocol is up
 5 minute input rate 5150000 bits/sec, 4464 packets/sec
 5 minute output rate 5121000 bits/sec, 4452 packets/sec

show interfaces fastEthernet 4/1/0
FastEthernet4/1/0 is up, line protocol is up
 5 minute input rate 2545000 bits/sec, 4019 packets/sec
 5 minute output rate 2220000 bits/sec, 3483 packets/sec

#show processes cpu sorted 1min
CPU utilization for five seconds: 99%/54%; one minute: 99%; five minutes: 98%
PID Runtime(ms)   Invoked      uSecs   5Sec   1Min   5Min TTY Process
 73   104986024 105856149        991 43.92% 46.18% 45.81%   0 IP Input

 

IOS идентичные rsp-jk9sv-mz.124-3g.bin

IP CEF включенны на обоих, и есть маршруты если просмотреть CEF, кого винить, что искать?

Edited by E^X

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

плин!!! no ip cef был на интерфейсах отключенно, по умолчанию, а на другой по умолчанию включён... вот же подгадило.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

А если еще написать ip cef distr ... то тогда.... Ой Вей!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this